7:30 p.m.
The Board of Directors of the San Benito County Water District convened in
regular session. All members of the Board were present together with District
Manager,
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
President Swanson asked all to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
2. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA:
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, approved the agenda as presented.
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR
Upon motion duly
made, seconded and carried, approved the minutes for
Director Buzzetta questioned his role on the Water Treatment Plant Committee and felt it was confusing in the minutes as to which committee the assignments were granted.
President Swanson clarified that Director Buzzetta was on the Water Treatment Plant Committee and Directors Perry and Gonzales were on the Groundwater Committee.
4. PUBLIC INPUT:
Jill LaCorte, 923 Los Viboras Road, indicated that she understood that the District would be reevaluating the percolation system. She requested that they not percolate Los Viboras Creek. She explained that they needed it to dry out so that they could do some major repairs. She questioned who owned the Pacheco Pass Bridge.
Manager Gregg stated that there was no percolation plan set for this year yet. He added that because of high groundwater in north county there would be limited percolation. He added that the break in the Hollister Conduit would also be a reason for limited percolation. He added that they would accommodate landowners.
Ms. LaCorte stated that the Pacheco Pass Water District Canal/Dam was in need of repair and contributed to some of their damage. She indicated that the low water crossing was not meant to be wet all year.
5) ALLOWANCE OF CLAIMS:
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, approved the claims as presented.
Director Rupert asked that the print on the claims listing be darker as it was difficult to read.
6)
REDUCTION IN WATER ALLOCATIONS (Bruce Mitzel):
Bruce Mitzel stated that he
had farmed all his life in
Manager Gregg stated that the bottom line was whether there was unused water or not.
Mr. Mitzel stated that he
understood the District policy to be that he had until
Manager Gregg stated that
there was come confusion and difference with respect to the facts. He indicated
that the contract was signed on
Mr. Mitzel stated that the
check was there on
Manager Gregg stated that the
paperwork showed that Mr. Mitzel’s land registration was not complete until
Director Gonzales asked the last date to return the water without penalty.
Mr. Mitzel stated
Director Perry stated that they had the problem 5 years ago and at that time they changed to a three tier level to alleviate. He added that at that time they made concessions and stated that they would not do it again. He indicated that there were many others that had unused water and paid for it.
Mr. Mitzel indicated that Ms.
Mirrione had said she would work with him. He added that he gave a letter to
Ms. Kemmer on
Director Gonzales asked where the water was that Mr. Mitzel purchased.
Manager Gregg stated San Luis Reservoir.
Director Gonzales suggested to Mr. Mitzel that he request the water and see if the District can perform and put it in his valve.
7)
REPORT ON DAMAGE TO HOLLISTER CONDUIT
1998:
Manager Gregg made a presentation including the display of transparencies. He indicated that they had lost about 300 feet of pipe.
Director Gonzales asked if they could use the same pipe.
Manager Gregg stated that even if the pipe is damaged, it can be repaired and was repairable in almost all cases. He noted that they would have to begin a search for a 54" dished head. He added that it could be two to three weeks before one was available. He stated that they were in operation, pressurized, up to Lone Tree Road and that there were 410 to 420 customers north of Lone Tree.
President Swanson asked how long the District could serve the customers at full capacity and pressure from San Justo Reservoir.
Manager Gregg answered 2 to 3 months. He explained a possible temporary connection.
President Swanson asked if the temporary pipe could put the them in full operation by May, if that was reasonable.
Manager Gregg concurred that it was.
President Swanson set a
special meeting for
Director Perry stated that if they had the information before that date they could expedite and have a special meeting even sooner.
8)
DISCUSSION OF DISTRICT FLOOD POWERS
President Swanson indicated that he had sent a letter to Rita Bowling, San Benito County Board of Supervisors, suggesting that the two boards get together and work on the responsibilities of flood control and drainage. He noted that the matter was brought up at Tuesday’s Board of Supervisors meeting.
9) CONSIDER RESOLUTION REQUESTING INCLUSION IN PROPOSED
LEGISLATION INCREASING COMPETITIVE BIDDING THRESHOLD:
Manager Gregg explained that competitive bidding thresholds were enacted some forty years ago and that an increase in thresholds was appropriate. He added that it did not preclude going to bid for lesser amounts.
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, adopted Resolution No. 98-4 and authorized the President to sign.
Director Buzzetta asked if it precluded seeking competitiveness.
Manager Gregg replied absolutely not.
10) INVESTMENT COMMITTEE; ANNUAL REVIEW OF INVESTMENT POLICY:
Director Gonzales explained that the Investment Committee had met and reviewed the Investment Policy and found it to be in compliance.
Director Buzzetta expressed concern with the rate of return they were receiving and believed they could get a higher return. He added that currently it was certainly safe and conservative. He asked about getting an assessment on the matter.
Counsel Pipal stated that they would have to have some type of financial consultant to do that.
Manager Gregg stated that the first step was to see what other public agencies were doing.
Director Gonzales stated that conservative and low risk investments were the general policy of the Board.
Manager Gregg stated that State law and the Investment Policy required annual review of the policy and Counsel had reviewed the policy, found no changes and that the policy was consistent with current laws.
11) DISTRICT MANAGER/ENGINEER’S REPORT:
Manager Gregg explained that they were at the point where they would be validating signatures on the SEIU signature cards. He explained the procedure of the petition, review and validate signatures, notice to employees and then a 30 day waiting period. He noted that the petitioner (SEIU) had refused an appropriate and quick way to validate signatures.
Manager Gregg stated that the Bureau had released that there would be a 65% supply south of the Delta.
Manager Gregg explained procedures for the canal and removal of debris and slides. He stated that there was damage upstream of the trash rack and gate. He stated that it was their intention to bypass with a couple sections of 36" culvert and they could divert it.
Manager
Gregg stated that the reservoir filled on or about
and that they were setting the top of the spillway discharge at 250 cfs. He noted that Hernandez Dam made life simpler down here just by being there. He added that the system seemed to be performing well.
Counsel Pipal stated that he had received a call back from Assemblyman
Frusetta stating that the legislation had come back from legislative counsel, had gone to committee and should be approved shortly.
Manager Gregg explained that it was their intent for the three agencies of the
City of Hollister, Sunnyslope County Water District and San Benito County Water District to create a joint effort with Sunnyslope as the lead agency for contract and administration purposes. He stated that State law agencies that provide urban water supply of 3,000 acre feet or more must prepare a plan. He stated that it was important for the District to be involved in it and that he would bring a resolution back to the Board.
Manager Gregg stated that the Groundwater Committee was working on an
irrigators’ workshop which was tentatively scheduled for
Director Perry spoke of community involvement.
Administrative Services Officer Thome reminded Counsel and Directors that
Statements of Economic Interest were due back to her by Wednesday,
The vote of each member of the Board on preceding matters was as follows, unless otherwise stated:
AYES: DIRECTORS: Rupert, Gonzales, Buzzetta, Perry, Swanson
NOES: DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: DIRECTORS: None
The Board adjourned at 9:20 p.m. to a special meeting to be held on Thursday,
________________________________________________
Robert M. Swanson, President
ATTEST:
_______________________________________________________
Denise R. Thome, Administrative Services Officer